Government & Strategic Developers
Compare planning and delivery scenarios across major sites, communities and districts.
Identify, develop, compare and advance the strongest opportunities through one connected decision system.
Book a Demo ↗| ↕ Metric | BenchmarkStrategy target | ✦ AI recommended Maple AvenueDallas · Multifamily | Irving BoulevardDallas · Mixed use | Harry HinesDallas · Multifamily | AveragePeer set |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development potential | |||||
| HMPotential homes | 320 | 356+36 | 410+90 | 328+8 | 365 |
| BABuildable area | 375k sf | 392k sf+17k | 448k sf+73k | 361k sf−14k | 400k sf |
| DUDensity / acre | 68 | 72+4 | 67−1 | 62−6 | 67 |
| Financial performance · base case | |||||
| LBLand basis / home | $48.0k | $45.8k−$2.2k | $51.2k+$3.2k | $43.1k−$4.9k | $46.7k |
| YCYield on cost | 6.5% | 6.9%+0.4 | 6.6%+0.1 | 6.5%At target | 6.7% |
| IRLevered IRR | 17.0% | 18.2%+1.2 | 17.4%+0.4 | 16.8%−0.2 | 17.5% |
| Risk & execution | |||||
| PRPlanning risk | Med. or lower | LowStronger | MediumAt target | HighBelow | Medium |
| DIOpen diligence items | ≤ 4 | 3−1 | 5+1 | 6+2 | 4.7 |
AI AgentsMaple Avenue offers the strongest balance of planning certainty, land basis and resilient return.
Compare planning and delivery scenarios across major sites, communities and districts.
Build a continuous pipeline of qualified opportunities with the analysis already completed.
Evaluate the physical and financial development thesis before capital is committed.
Find and qualify opportunities based on their full development potential.
Generate and compare viable ways a site or district can be developed.
Compare complete investment cases and prepare structured recommendations.
Acquisition, planning, design, finance and investment teams often work from different versions of the same opportunity. UnlockLand keeps the underlying land, evidence, scenarios and economics consistent while presenting the metrics each team needs.
The result is a continuous decision chain from market strategy through feasibility, scenario selection, underwriting and approval.
Connect capacity, housing, infrastructure, policy and delivery outcomes across large-scale development decisions.
Screen more markets and sites while maintaining consistent feasibility, scenario and return criteria.
Evaluate whether the physical plan, planning basis and financial model support the same investment thesis.
Preserve evidence, assumptions, alternatives, review status and the rationale behind each decision.
Define the market, program and decision criteria
Identify and qualify relevant land
Establish feasibility and credible scenarios
Connect each scenario to economics and risk
Compare opportunities on a common basis
Advance a documented recommendation